Why Aren’t We Seeing Justice?
Segment #794
If the media covered 25% of the outrageous corruption on the left, the pressure would be so intense that grand juries would have to indict. But that is not our world and the Dems are arrogant because they know the standard of justice imposed on the right will always be more harsh.. at least in the near term. But this lack of justice comes at a price that ultimately the American citizen must pay. Independent news sources are weakening the ability of corrupt media to control the message.
In early 2026, many conservative legal experts and Republican lawmakers are arguing exactly that: that the "fairness" of the justice system is currently broken by what they call "geographic bias." The inability to indict high-profile Democrats—even with a DOJ led by figures like Jeanine Pirro—isn't a lack of evidence, but a structural failure of the jury system in certain areas.
The "Ham Sandwich" Exception
There is a famous legal saying that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich." However, recent 2026 events are proof that this no longer applies to Democrats in blue cities:
The February 11, 2026 Rebuff: A D.C. grand jury refused to indict Sen. Mark Kelly, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, and four others for "seditious behavior." Conservative commentators argued that the evidence—a video they claim interfered with the military chain of command—was more than enough for "probable cause," and that the grand jury’s refusal was purely political.
The "Blue Shield" Theory: Legal analysts on the right frequently cite the jury pools in Washington, D.C. (which voted over 90% for Democrats) and Fulton County, GA as "impenetrable shields" for Democratic politicians. They argue that these jurors view themselves as a "resistance" to the current administration rather than neutral arbiters of fact.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yulRS4GyAnc?feature=share
"Shielding" Opponents: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt explicitly accused Judge Currie of trying to "shield Letitia James and James Comey from receiving accountability."
The Push for "Venue Neutrality"
Because of this perceived bias, there is a growing movement in conservative legal circles to change where politicians are prosecuted.
Strategic Relocation: Conservative groups are pushing for new federal rules or laws that would allow "crimes against the nation" (like election fraud or foreign influence peddling) to be tried in "neutral" or "red" districts where the jury pool isn't dominated by one party.
The Argument: They argue that if Republicans are routinely indicted and convicted in blue cities (pointing to cases against the former President and his allies), then the "only way to balance the scales" is to prosecute Democrats in districts that aren't predisposed to protect them.
Where the "Right" is Seeing Success
While the "biased grand jury" is seen as a wall in D.C., conservative sources highlight that the system is working when the venue changes:
State-Level Success: In states like Colorado and New Jersey, where local prosecutors or specific jurisdictions are less "captured" by the D.C. establishment, indictments and convictions (like the 2026 forgery conviction of Sonya Jaquez Lewis) are being used as proof that justice is possible when the "D.C. bubble" is removed.
The Bottom Line
Conservative sources essentially argue that the U.S. now has a "Two-Tiered Justice System" defined by geography. In their view, "The Right" has the evidence, but "The Left" has the jurors—making the battle over venue change the most important legal fight of 2026.
Present and Possible Future Indictments
The following list is based on active investigations and criminal referrals highlighted by conservative outlets and House committees:
1. The "Fair Tabulation" Case (Fulton County, GA)
BREAKING NEWS: FBI criminal warrant on Fulton County 2020 ballots
This is arguably the most serious active criminal probe.
The Specifics: On January 28, 2026, the FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton County Election Hub.
The Indictment Path: Conservative legal analysts argue that the affidavit supporting the raid focuses on 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights) and 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law).
Targets: Robb Pitts (Fulton County Chairman) and other election officials. The theory is that intentional "deficiencies" in the 2020 and 2024 tabulations constituted a federal crime by depriving voters of a fair count.
2. Money Laundering & FARA: The Biden Family
While Hunter Biden was previously pardoned by his father, conservative investigators have pivoted to a new strategy:
The Referrals: In June 2024, the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees formally referred Hunter and James Biden for criminal prosecution for making false statements to Congress.
The New 2026 Focus: Investigative leads now focus on Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) violations involving "un-pardoned" conduct from late 2024 and 2025. Conservative commentators on The Daily Wire and Fox News suggest that because the pardon was limited to an 11-year window ending in late 2024, any financial activity in 2025 involving foreign entities remains "fair game" for indictment.
3. Contempt of Congress: Bill and Hillary Clinton
This has moved from political theater to a legal standoff.
The Specifics: Following a January 2026 House vote to hold them in contempt over the "Epstein Files," the Clintons are currently undergoing depositions (February 26-27, 2026).
The Indictment Path: If the U.S. Attorney for D.C., Jeanine Pirro, determines their testimony was obstructive or that they perjured themselves regarding their knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein’s activities, a criminal indictment for Perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) or Obstruction of a Congressional Investigation (18 U.S.C. § 1505) is the next logical step.
4. National Fraud Enforcement: "The War on Fraud"
The newly established National Fraud Enforcement Division at the DOJ is targeting what it calls "rampant and pervasive" fraud in blue-state programs.
Specific Focus: Minnesota’s "Feeding Our Future" and other pandemic-era programs.
The Targets: Conservative sources point to potential indictments of state-level Democratic officials and nonprofit leaders who oversaw these programs. The DOJ has already issued over 1,750 subpoenas and executed 130 search warrants in this "War on Fraud" as of February 2026.
5. "Straw Donor" Felonies
Conservative watchdogs are pushing for the indictment of the organizers behind Building our Future Today (BOFT), LLC.
The Case: BOFT funneled $2.5 million into Democratic PACs shortly after its creation.
The Charge: Under 52 U.S.C. § 30122, it is a felony to make a contribution in the name of another. Conservative legal experts argue this is an "open-and-shut" case to indict the unknown donors who used the LLC as a front.
In November 2025, U.S. Representative Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a Democrat representing Florida's 20th District, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Miami. She faces charges related to the alleged theft of $5 million in FEMA funds, money laundering, and campaign finance fraud. Prosecutors allege she used "straw donors"—friends and family members—to funnel the FEMA money into her campaign under their names to hide the source. She is also accused of conspiring with her tax preparer to file false returns by inflating charitable contributions and mislabeling personal/political expenses as business deductions.