What Have We Created in the U.S.

Segment # 412

Its OK for BLM to destroy property and kill citizens. Its OK for terrorists to slaughter and rape Jews in Israel and now it becomes OK for Mangione to kill the CEO of an insurance company. Our leaders are training our population to destroy society and our culture

To put the fate of the accused in the hands of a jury of their peers is the very fabric of our judicial system. That process is making some pretty basic assumptions that can no longer be taken for granted.

Jury nullification is a legal concept in which a jury returns a "not guilty" verdict despite believing the defendant is technically guilty under the law. This occurs when the jury disagrees with the law itself, believes the law is being unjustly applied, or thinks the punishment is too harsh.

Key Points:

  • Power, not a right: Jurors have the power to nullify but are generally not informed of this by judges or lawyers. Courts do not officially recognize it as a "right" that must be disclosed.

  • Historical examples:

    • Fugitive Slave Act trials: Northern juries refused to convict people aiding runaway slaves.

    • Prohibition era: Jurors frequently refused to convict for alcohol-related crimes.

  • Controversy:

    • Advocates say it's a check on unjust laws and government overreach.

    • Critics argue it can undermine the rule of law and lead to inconsistent justice—especially when used for discriminatory reasons (e.g., all-white juries acquitting white defendants in civil rights era cases).

  • Legality:

    • Courts usually do not allow explicit arguments for jury nullification in trial.

    • Jurors can’t be punished for their verdict, but they can be removed during deliberations if they admit their intent is to nullify.

Would you like examples of how this has played out in specific cases or want to know how different states treat it?

Kohlberger

Kohberger has pleaded not guilty to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty if he is convicted. Jury selection is scheduled to begin on July 30, 2025, with the trial set to start on August 11. ​

Mistrust of the justice system: Some believe Kohberger is being framed, pointing to what they see as shaky forensic evidence or procedural missteps. They portray him as a victim of corrupt institutions.

  1. Intellectual idolization: As a Ph.D. student in criminology, Kohberger is viewed by some as intelligent, methodical, and misunderstood—traits that have led to comparisons with fictional antiheroes (e.g., Dexter, Hannibal Lecter).

  2. True crime fandom and “dark psychology” obsession: A niche but real subset of online users (especially in forums like Reddit and TikTok) are drawn to the psychological profile of accused criminals.

  3. Romantic infatuation: Some women have publicly declared affection or attraction to Kohberger (similar to Ted Bundy or the Menendez brothers), writing him letters or posting online tributes.

Mangione

Jury nullification has emerged as a significant concern in the upcoming trial of Luigi Mangione, who is accused of fatally shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024. The case has garnered widespread attention due to Mangione's portrayal by some as a vigilante challenging systemic issues in the U.S. healthcare system.

Luigi Mangione, a 26-year-old accused of fatally shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, has become a polarizing figure. While many condemn the act, a segment of the public has rallied behind him, viewing him as a symbol of resistance against perceived injustices in the U.S. healthcare system.​GiveSendGo+9Gizmodo+9WBMA+9

Public Perception and Support

Mangione's supporters have labeled him an "American hero" and a "modern-day Robin Hood," expressing frustration with the healthcare industry's practices. This sentiment has been amplified by the phrase "Deny, Defend, Depose," reportedly found on shell casings at the crime scene, which critics associate with tactics used by insurance companies to deny claims .​Gizmodo+5Reuters+5WBMA+5

Fundraising Efforts

In the wake of Mangione's arrest, supporters initiated fundraising campaigns to cover his legal expenses. While GoFundMe removed such campaigns citing violations of their terms of service, the platform GiveSendGo has hosted a fundraiser that has raised over $900,000 as of April 2025 . The campaign, organized by the December 4th Legal Committee, states that if Mangione declines the funds, they will be redirected to other defendants facing politicized charges.​Wikipedia+1WBMA+1Gizmodo+3The Guardian+3Wikipedia+3WBMA+3GiveSendGo+3The Guardian+3

Legal Representation

Mangione has retained attorneys Thomas Dickey and Karen Friedman Agnifilo to represent him in his legal proceedings. His defense team has launched an official website to provide updates and information regarding his case .​WBMA+5Wikipedia+5Reddit+5

Controversy and Criticism

The support for Mangione has sparked debate. Critics argue that glorifying an individual accused of a violent crime is inappropriate, regardless of underlying frustrations with systemic issues. Law enforcement officials have expressed concern over the public's reaction, emphasizing that taking the law into one's own hands is not a solution to systemic problems .​Yahoo+11Gizmodo+11Wikipedia+11

Mangione's case continues to draw national attention, highlighting deep-seated tensions surrounding healthcare, justice, and public perception in the United States.​Wikipedia+1Reuters+1

Anthony

As of April 2025, there is no public indication that jury nullification is being pursued or discussed in the case of Karmelo Anthony, the 17-year-old charged with first-degree murder in the fatal stabbing of fellow student Austin Metcalf during a Frisco, Texas track meet on April 2. Anthony has been released on a reduced bond of $250,000 and is under house arrest with an ankle monitor. The Anthony family is seeking justification by claiming racism. Their spokesperson is a criminal racist grifter that will only exacerbate the already very tense atmosphere. See the charge sheet below on Dominique Alexander

The incident has sparked significant public debate, with discussions focusing on race, self-defense, and the legal system.​

Incident Details: Karmelo Anthony allegedly stabbed 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during an altercation at a Frisco ISD track meet. Witnesses reported a verbal dispute that escalated, leading to the fatal stabbing. Anthony was arrested at the scene and later released on a reduced bond with conditions, including house arrest and electronic monitoring. ​CBS News

  1. Public Reaction: The case has garnered national attention, with some individuals portraying Anthony as a victim of systemic racism and others condemning the act as unjustifiable violence. Online platforms have seen polarized discussions, with some users expressing support for Anthony, citing self-defense, while others criticize the glorification of his actions. ​Reddit

  2. Family Statements: Both families have faced harassment and threats amid the public discourse. Defense attorneys have urged the public to refrain from inflammatory rhetoric, emphasizing the need for a fair legal process.

Previous
Previous

Ibogaine - Is It In Your Future

Next
Next

Dems Fight for Illegal Aliens