AN INCONVENIENT STUDY: RAW DATA, REAL QUESTIONS

Segment #736

Back to the Fifth grade playground…. Put up or shut up. Ford Health is lying about this study and have already proved it on tape with the documentary “An Inconvenient Study”. The Covid vaccine in its presence form is a big problem.

AN INCONVENIENT STUDY: RAW DATA, REAL QUESTIONS - The HighWire

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, joins Del to break down a new reanalysis of the Henry Ford Health vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study featured in An Inconvenient Study. By examining the raw data rather than heavily modeled conclusions, Hulscher finds higher rates across all 22 chronic disease categories—including cancer—among vaccinated children, along with a more than 500% increased likelihood of autism. As one of the strongest real-world datasets available—among only 12 true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies—the findings raise serious questions about long-standing vaccine safety assumptions and the rapidly expanding childhood schedule. Hulscher also discusses a separate paper on flu vaccine effectiveness that found a 27% increased risk of contracting the flu among vaccinated individuals, and shares his personal journey that led him to work alongside Dr. Peter McCullough.

AN INCONVENIENT STUDY: RAW DATA, REAL QUESTIONS - The HighWire

This summarizes an episode of The HighWire (hosted by Del Bigtree, aired around December 2025) featuring epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, affiliated with the McCullough Foundation. Hulscher discusses a December 2025 peer-reviewed reanalysis (co-authored with John W. Oller Jr., PhD, and Daniel Broudy, PhD) of raw data from an unpublished 2020 draft study by Henry Ford Health researchers (Lamerato et al.). The original draft compared health outcomes in ~18,468 children (16,511 vaccinated, 1,957 unvaccinated) within the Henry Ford system from 2000–2016.

Key Claims from Hulscher's Reanalysis

• Vaccinated children showed higher proportional rates of chronic conditions across all 22 categories examined, including a ~54% higher cancer rate and ~549% higher odds of autism-spectrum-associated neurodevelopmental disorders (grouping conditions like autism, ADHD, developmental delays, etc.).

• The reanalysis used direct proportional comparisons, arguing that the original study's adjusted odds ratios masked disparities, especially where unvaccinated cases were zero or low.

• Hulscher frames this as one of ~12 "true" vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated studies, all allegedly showing poorer outcomes in vaccinated children.

• He also references a separate Cleveland Clinic preprint (2025) on the 2024–2025 flu season, finding ~27% higher influenza risk (negative vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%) among vaccinated adults.

These claims have circulated widely in anti-vaccine outlets (e.g., Children's Health Defense, Vigilant Fox, Global Research) and align with narratives from figures like Peter McCullough, MD.

Criticisms and Limitations of the Studies

The Henry Ford draft was never published or submitted for peer review by its authors, who shelved it due to methodological flaws. Henry Ford Health publicly stated it was rejected internally for "serious issues with data and methodology" and was not suppressed. Independent experts (e.g., biostatisticians from University of Pennsylvania, Stanford, and reviews in The Conversation and

Henry Ford Health is Lying

Ford’s position should give the consumer serious concerns about believing anything Ford or the industry says in response to the Ford study.

The claim you're referring to appears to stem from the 2025 documentary An Inconvenient Study, produced by Del Bigtree and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN). The film includes hidden-camera (secretly recorded) footage of conversations with Dr. Marcus Zervos (head of infectious diseases at Henry Ford Health and lead author of the 2020 draft study). In those recordings, Zervos reportedly expresses that the methodology and results are sound, discusses concerns about professional repercussions (e.g., "nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job"), and wrestles with the decision not to publish.Bigtree and ICAN frame this as evidence that Zervos (or Henry Ford leadership) initially agreed to publish the results "no matter what" (as part of the original challenge in 2016–2017) but later reneged due to the "inconvenient" findings showing poorer health outcomes in vaccinated children.However, Henry Ford Health has consistently stated the opposite in public communications (including fact-check pages and a cease-and-desist letter to the filmmakers):

• The draft was shelved immediately after internal peer review in 2020 due to "serious issues with data and methodology" (e.g., unequal follow-up times, vastly different healthcare utilization rates leading to detection bias, demographic mismatches between groups, small unvaccinated sample).

• It was never submitted for external peer review or publication because it did not meet their scientific standards—not suppressed for political or ideological reasons.

• They deny any cover-up and describe claims of suppression as "patently false, defamatory, and troubling," warning that promoting the draft risks spreading dangerous misinformation.
  
  Defammation?

  Te simple proof is that no suit was filed by Ford or any other party to the study. The would never open the industry to a deposition by Aaron Siri. They are lying and that’s all you need to know.