The Foundation for a Coup
Segment #568
Starting from 2016 it is both difficult and confusing to chronicle everything the left has done to destroy Donald Trump. There is nobody that I could imagine that could have prevailed through this gauntlet of corruption. Trump deserves to see some accountability for all this ridiculously unfair treatment. View it through the timeline and how Trump has beaten his opposition every time. The probability that this treatment he has endured was justified is insignificantly low. And as you look at each case and understand in the coming months you will come to appreciate the greatness of Donald Trump and the evil of those who oppose him. If you think the Mamdanis, AOCs, Shumers, Schiffs,and Bookers are on your side, you better think again.
Steele Dossier and Crossfire Hurricane
Now that the Annex to the Durham Report has been declassified, the timeline and what was known about the Steele dossier's funding and credibility are key to understanding this issue .
Obama Was Briefed on the Dossier: A summary of the dossier's allegations was included as an annex to a larger Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian interference in the 2016 election.1 President Obama was briefed on this ICA in January 2017, shortly before he left office.2 At that point, the dossier's core allegations were considered by intelligence officials to be "raw intelligence" and unverified.
The Funding was Not Publicly Disclosed: The fact that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was not publicly known at the time of the briefing. This information was first reported by the media in October 2017, nearly a year after Obama's briefing.
Obama Administration's Awareness: While the general public and President Obama may not have known the specific funding source at the time, official reports from the Department of Justice Inspector General and the Durham special counsel investigation have since raised questions about what some high-ranking FBI and DOJ officials knew. These reports have concluded that the FBI failed to disclose the political origins of the dossier to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court when they used it to obtain a warrant on a Trump campaign aide. However, there is no public evidence that President Obama was personally briefed on the specific funding source from the Clinton campaign.
The Durham Report's Focus: The Durham report focused not on the ICA's overall conclusion, but on the process by which the FBI initiated its investigation into the Trump campaign, known as "Crossfire Hurricane." The report criticized the FBI for launching a full investigation with what it deemed to be insufficient evidence and for exhibiting a "lack of analytical rigor" and "confirmation bias."
The Dossier's Role: The Durham report extensively criticized the FBI's reliance on the Steele dossier, which it noted was funded by the Clinton campaign and contained unverified information.4 The report highlighted that the FBI continued to use the dossier in its FISA applications even after it had evidence that undercut its credibility.5 However, this is distinct from the ICA's overall conclusion about Russian meddling, which was based on a wide range of intelligence, not just the dossier.
Hunter Biden Laptop
When Hunter Biden abandoned his laptop, it created enormous problems for Biden in his 2020 run for President. The laptop had to be discredited and Mike Morell and Blinken came up with a plan. It was all a lie
The evidence surrounding the letter from the 51 intelligence officials, when analyzed collectively, leads to the conclusion that it was not a coincidence. The weight of the evidence strongly suggests it was a politically motivated act.
Here is a more direct breakdown of the facts that support this conclusion:
Admitted Intent: Michael Morell, a primary organizer of the letter, has testified under oath that his intention was to provide a "talking point" for the Biden campaign. He stated that a conversation with then-campaign advisor Antony Blinken "set in motion the events that led to" the letter's creation.1 This testimony provides direct evidence of coordination and political purpose.
Strategic Timing: The letter was released just days after the initial New York Post story on the laptop and immediately before a presidential debate. The timing was crucial, as it allowed the Biden campaign to use the letter as a ready-made rebuttal to a damaging story in a high-stakes, public forum.
Misleading Language: While the letter carefully avoided stating the laptop was definitively Russian disinformation, it used the phrase "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."2 This phrasing, given the context, was highly effective in creating a false impression. As one of the signatories, Douglas Wise, later admitted, "all of us figured that a significant portion of that content had to be real to make any Russian disinformation credible." This suggests a calculated choice of words to mislead the public without making a directly provable false statement.
Impact on Public Discourse: The letter was used by the Biden campaign and amplified by social media and news outlets to justify suppressing the story. This had a tangible effect on what information a significant portion of the electorate had access to in the final weeks of the election.
The combination of these facts — a coordinated effort with a political campaign, a clear timeline, the admitted intent of an organizer, and the predictable public impact — leads to a logical and evidence-based conclusion that the letter was created for political purposes. To suggest that all of these factors were a coincidence would be to ignore the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
Lawfare and Assassination Attempts
Indicted: Four times.1 The indictments were related to falsifying business records in New York, his handling of classified documents, and his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in both Washington, D.C. and Georgia.
Impeached: Twice.2 He is the only U.S. president to have been impeached two times.3 The first impeachment in 2019 was for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, and the second in 2021 was for incitement of insurrection.4
Victim of an assassination attempt: There have been multiple security incidents and at least two confirmed assassination attempts. The most serious of these occurred in July 2024 at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, where he was shot in the ear.5 A second attempt took place in September 2024 at his golf club in Florida.6