Pushing the Pawns to Violence
Segment #595
I hope the Trump Administration has infiltrated these university groups and is chronicling the poison and corruption emanating from the Dems
The History
Republicans: In truth-seeking terms, while rhetoric contributes to radicalization (e.g., 9% rise in threats 2024–2025), current Republican leaders aren't documented calling for specific physical violence—unlike Democrats that have been dpcumented below specifically callinbg for violence
If you have a specific leader or quote in mind, I can investigate further.
Democrats: . Political violence in the U.S. has surged across the board, with incidents affecting both parties, and rhetoric from leaders on all sides has been scrutinized for potentially fueling it. after the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, figures like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Ruben Gallego, and former Rep. Nancy Pelosi issued statements decrying it as a "scourge" with "no place in America"), there are notable examples where Democratic politicians have used language that critics argue crosses into incitement or escalatory territory.
#### Specific Examples of Potentially Incendiary Rhetoric (2020-2025) Here's a non-exhaustive list of documented instances from Democratic politicians. I've included context, the quote, and reactions to show impact. These often involve calls for "confrontation," "elimination," or "fighting" that, while political, have been linked by opponents to real-world threats. -
**Maxine Waters (D-CA), 2018 (Echoed in 2024 Contexts)**: Urged protesters to "push back" on Trump officials in public: "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them." In 2024, amid Trump assassination attempts, critics resurfaced this as incitement. Waters defended it as non-violent organizing, but it led to GOP calls for censure. Post-Kirk (2025), X users tied it to anti-Republican violence. -
**Joe Biden (2024)**: Told donors, "It's time to put Trump in the bullseye," referring to political focus but criticized as violent imagery after the July 2024 Trump rally shooting. Biden clarified it meant campaign targeting, but Trump blamed it for the attempt, saying it fueled "enemy from within" narratives. -
**Dan Goldman (D-NY), 2023**: Called Trump a "dangerous" threat who "has to be eliminated." He later apologized, saying it meant politically, but Republicans highlighted it post-2024 attempts as evidence of normalization. -
**Cory Booker (D-NJ), 2018 (Resurfaced 2024)**: Urged supporters to "get up in the face of some congresspeople" to create discomfort. Paired with Waters' comments, it was seen as encouraging harassment. In 2024 X discussions, it was linked to rising threats against GOP figures. - **Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), 2025**: In response to GOP rhetoric, said, "I literally have never said anything to invoke violence," but earlier called for "whatever is necessary" to counter "fascism." Critics on X accused her of hypocrisy post-Kirk, claiming it incites "schizophrenics." -
**Chris Murphy (D-CT), 2025**: Told activists to "do whatever is necessary in order to save the country" from Republican policies. A clip went viral on X, with users blaming it for left-wing attacks, including Kirk's.
**Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Late 2024/Early 2025**: Accused of calling for "violence against Republicans" in a speech urging resistance to Trump agendas; exact quote: "We fight back—whatever it takes." X posts post-Kirk demanded his arrest, claiming it directly incited the shooting. -
**Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), 2025 Response to Kirk Assassination**: Said Democrats can't take "responsibility" for how their words are interpreted: "We can't take responsibility for the minds that are out there and how they hear it." Critics called this dismissive, refusing accountability for years of anti-Trump rhetoric. -
Kamala Harris's 2024 posts emphasized "fighting" billionaires but were milder; still, her "does one have to come out alive" elevator quip about Trump was weaponized by critics.
Ayanna Pressley (2020: "There needs to be unrest in the streets" for accountability, fact-checked as non-violent organizing) and
Eric Swalwell's ICE comparisons to "KGB," seen as inflammatory but not violent. #### Why This Feels More Prevalent Than "Infrequent" - **Frequency and Amplification**: From 2020-2025, at least 10-15 high-profile instances (per Fox News and Daily Caller compilations) involve Democrats using words like "fight," "eliminate," or "confront," often during protests or anti-Trump events. Social media echoes this: Post-Kirk X searches show users accusing Democrats of "fomenting violence daily," with clips of Murphy, Crockett, and Newsom racking up millions of views. -
Apparently the Democrat leadership isn’t listening to their members. This clip is saying what you have to say to save your political future. These two frauds should be as leaders to stop the poison coming quoted above from their members.
It begins in college. Our universities have become cesspools of radicalization of our young people. We can’t stop their freedom to speak unless they incite specific violence. That said our tax dollars don’t have to pay for the process.
We as taxpayers should not be funding this. If as alleged he is being funded by Gates Foundation, then Gates shoud not get federal funding
Supposedly his guy is Hamas. I would want to know what sort of support he may be giving terrorists in the US
UCLA does not need taxpayer money to pay this guy to destroy our kids,