More Lies Uncovered from WHO
Segment # 135
Thank our good luck that we still have some semblance of a court system that force the truth from Government and Corporate entities that are literally bleeding us dry. The WHO, which is 80% funded by private money, got caught again – this time on vaccine passports that failed to prevent transmission. How many businesses and lives were lost as a result of this decision.
At the end of this email we see WHO predicted a 77% increase in cancer by 2050. And again the courts will force big Pharm, our government and WHO to admit the impact of turbo cancers and the vaccine injured.
The Lies that were Proven False
* Six feet of separation which justified the lockdowns, high suicide rates, businesses being bankrupted was just made up admitted by both Birx and Fauci
* No Ivermectin is not horse paste – that info is not as of this email deleted from FDA and CDC websites
* Corchrane Institute just published a study “uncertainty about the effects of face masks" and that the "low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed estimate of the effect – Hardly an endorsement by Fauci to wearing double masks
* Lawsuits against the government are forcing them to admit the troubling data provided by VSafe and VAERS databases indicates serious vaccine problems.
* Excess death peaking in the third quarter of 2021 is now attributed primarily to COVID vaccines and their very limited safety test protocols.
* Contrary to Pfizer and Government promotions …Pfizer testified in front of the European Union that they never tested to see if the vaccines stopped the spread of the disease. The tape is on the website
* Contrary to safety assurances by government and Big Pharm there is DNA fragment contamination is some of the COVID vaccines,
*Contrary to assurances on tape by government and Big Pharm taking the vaccine does not guarantee protection for you against COVID
*And yes the virus did originate in the Wuhan lab funded by Fauci and the US government contrary to Fauci’s protestations.
And Now we can add to the list the latest admission extracted from WHO through the courts.
WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports Failed; WHO Knew Vaccines Didn't Prevent Transmission
In a groundbreaking court case, a top WHO vaccine expert has admitted that COVID vaccine passports were unnecessary and misleading, as the vaccines failed to prevent transmission. This revelation, along with the tireless efforts of health freedom advocates, exposes the unconstitutionality of these passports and the erosion of fundamental rights under the guise of public health. As the truth unfolds, it is time for citizens to demand accountability from their governments and protect their liberties against overreach and coercion.
In a stunning courtroom revelation, Dr. Hanna Nohynek, the World Health Organization's chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization, testified that she advised her government against implementing COVID vaccine passports, as the vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security.1 The admission came to light during a lawsuit in Helsinki, where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing the government after being denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport. Dr. Nohynek stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission, yet vaccine passports continued to be required.1
Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a British cardiologist, will also testify in the case, stating that "during the COVID pandemic, some authorities and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, which undermined informed patient consent and evidence-based medical practice."2 In his written testimony, Dr. Malhotra emphasizes that "there was never any evidence justifying any COVID-19 vaccine mandates, passports or any of the other coercive measures adopted by various governments worldwide."2 He also argues that "the time has come to stop misleading evidence flowing downstream into media reporting and clinical decision making and resulting in unethical and unscientific policy decisions."2
The revelations from Dr. Nohynek and Dr. Malhotra raise serious questions about the necessity and efficacy of COVID vaccine passports, which restricted citizens' freedoms and may have provided a false sense of security during the pandemic.
These findings align with the concerns raised by health freedom advocates, including Stand for Health Freedom (SHF), who have been at the forefront of educating Americans about the unconstitutionality of vaccine passports. In mid-November 2022, leaders of the G20 countries met in Bali, Indonesia and made a sweeping declaration that included an endorsement of proof of vaccinations for global travel. President Joseph Biden agreed, posting the Bali Declaration on Whitehouse.gov. However, this does not represent the will of the vast majority of American people and shows the White House bypassing the democratic process and the Constitution by creating international "nonbinding" agreements that should require the consent of the U.S. Senate.3
As of November 2022, 20 U.S. states have banned vaccine credentials, while only six states support vaccine passports through law.3 It is clear most Americans do not want vaccine passports affecting their rights. The U.S. Constitution protects the right to travel, privacy, and informed consent. A vaccine passport for travel cannot stand if the Constitution is honored.
SHF points out that requiring citizens to show proof of vaccination to travel freely violates fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution, including freedom of movement, bodily autonomy, privacy, and informed consent. Through petitions, calls to action, and providing resources for citizens to contact their representatives, SHF has mobilized health freedom advocates to push back against the implementation of vaccine passports at both the state and federal levels. Their efforts have contributed to the 20 states that have banned vaccine credentials, demonstrating the power of informed and engaged citizens standing up for their constitutional rights.3
As the push for digital identities linked to health data intensifies globally, SHF continues to sound the alarm and empower Americans to protect their liberties from government overreach and erosion of privacy in the name of public health. Their work serves as a vital counterweight to the international agreements and public-private partnerships driving the adoption of these invasive technologies without adequate public debate or constitutional scrutiny.3
The combination of Dr. Nohynek's admission and SHF's ongoing efforts to protect health freedom highlights the importance of questioning the legitimacy and constitutionality of vaccine passports. As more evidence comes to light, it is crucial that citizens hold their governments accountable and demand the protection of their fundamental rights and liberties.
Make sure to get involved with Stand for Health Freedom to ensure your fundamental medical rights are protected. Join for free here.
References
1. Thacker, P. D. (2023, April 12). WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports May Have Been a Scam. DisInformation Chronicle. https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/who-official-admits-vaccine-passports
2. Malhotra, A. (2023, November 29). Statement COVID-19 Vaccines Safety and Efficacy by Dr Aseem Malhotra MD for Mika Vauhkala. https://draseemmalhotra.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/dr-aseem-malhotra-helsink-court-statement.pdf
3. Stand for Health Freedom. (n.d.). WHO'S CALLING THE SHOTS? VACCINE PASSPORTS ARE UN-AMERICAN. https://standforhealthfreedom.com/whos-calling-the-shots-vaccine-passports-are-un-american/
The GMI Research Group (GMIRG) is dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues of the day. Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health. Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in which the present condition of the human body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
WHO Cancer Agency Predicts 77% Rise in Cancers by 2050
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 17, 2024Download PDF
WHO Cancer Agency Predicts 77% Rise in Cancers by 2050 (mercola.com)
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer estimates more than 35 million new cancer cases in 2050. This represents a 77% increase from the estimated 20 million cancer cases that occurred in 2022. WHO blamed the rising cancer rates on an aging population, along with tobacco, alcohol, obesity and exposure to air pollution. WHO ignored the emergence of rapid-growing “turbo cancers” in people who have received one or more COVID-19 shots.
Many of these cancers are showing up in young people, many under age 30, with no family history of cancer; treatment protocols are available to help recover from post-jab injuries
The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) released a daunting prediction of the global cancer burden. It estimates more than 35 million new cancer cases in 2050 — a 77% increase from the estimated 20 million cancer cases that occurred in 2022.1
While WHO named an aging population as a key driver behind the increasing cancer burden, along with tobacco, alcohol, obesity and exposure to air pollution, what they’re ignoring is the concerning trend of turbo cancers that occur shortly after COVID-19 shots.
Cancer Cases Set to Increase Significantly by 2050
The IARC cancer burden estimates are based on the “best sources of data available in [185] countries in 2022.”2 That year, there were an estimated 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million deaths, with WHO reporting, “About 1 in 5 people develop cancer in their lifetime, approximately 1 in 9 men and 1 in 12 women die from the disease.”3
About two-thirds of the new cancer cases and deaths were caused by 10 types of cancer. Lung cancer was most common, followed by female breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer and stomach cancer. When broken down by sex, breast cancer was the most commonly diagnosed — and the leading cause of cancer death — among women. For men, it was lung cancer.
Lung cancer and colorectal cancer accounted for the second and third most diagnosed types and cause of most deaths among women. However, for men, prostate and colorectal cancers were second and third most common, while liver and colorectal cancer caused the second and third most cancer deaths.4
There were also disparities revealed based on human development index (HDI), a statistical tool that assesses three dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge (schooling) and a decent standard of living. According to WHO:5
“In terms of the absolute burden, high HDI countries are expected to experience the greatest absolute increase in incidence, with an additional 4.8 million new cases predicted in 2050 compared with 2022 estimates. Yet the proportional increase in incidence is most striking in low HDI countries (142% increase) and in medium HDI countries (99%). Likewise, cancer mortality in these countries is projected to almost double in 2050.”
What’s Driving Up Cancer Rates?
WHO blamed the projected cancer burden increase on a combination of age and environmental factors, stating:6
“The rapidly growing global cancer burden reflects both population ageing and growth, as well as changes to people’s exposure to risk factors, several of which are associated with socioeconomic development. Tobacco, alcohol and obesity are key factors behind the increasing incidence of cancer, with air pollution still a key driver of environmental risk factors.”
But it did not mention the emergence of rapid-growing cancers of the breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, pancreas, bile duct, brain, lung and blood — including exceedingly rare types of cancer. As noted by Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis in the Highwire interview above,7 these cancers are showing up in young people, many under age 30, with no family history of cancer.
They’re showing up in pregnant women and young children. Equally odd is the fact that most are Stage 3 or 4 by the time they’re diagnosed, with symptoms arising only days or weeks before. The cancers grow and spread so rapidly, many of these patients die before treatment can even begin. Most of them are also resistant to conventional treatment.
The phenomenon has become common enough that the term “turbo cancers” was coined to describe these rapid-growing cancers in people who have received one or more COVID jabs.
Turbo Cancer Cases Reported Following COVID-19 Shots
In a case report described by board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and colleagues, basaloid carcinoma, a type of aggressive cancer, developed in a 56-year-old man shortly after he received an mRNA COVID-19 shot.
Early symptoms, which began just four days after the jab, were similar to those caused by Bell’s palsy, and involved head pain — but soon a tumor developed on his ear and face. According to the study:8
“We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.
… Since facial paralysis/pain is one of the more common adverse neurological events following mRNA injection, careful inspection of cutaneous/soft tissue should be conducted to rule out malignancy.”
This is just one example. Another case report, published in Frontiers in Medicine,9 also found a “rapid progression” of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) — a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) — following an mRNA COVID booster shot. AITL is a cancer that affects the lymph system, primarily involving T-cells, a type of white blood cell that plays a crucial role in the immune system.
“Since nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines strongly activate T follicular helper cells, it is important to explore the possible impact of approved SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines on neoplasms affecting this cell type,” the study notes.10
The cancer occurred in a 66-year-old man, mere days after he got his third Pfizer shot. Ironically, he got the shot to protect him during chemotherapy, and in eight days, the cancer just exploded and spread like wildfire.
According to Makis, that kind of progression would normally take a couple of years, or at least a few months. “Such a rapid evolution would be highly unexpected in the natural course in the disease,” according to the study.11
How Might COVID-19 Shots Trigger Cancer?
In May 2021, I interviewed Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, about the likely hazards of replacing the uracil in the RNA used in the COVID shots with synthetic methylpseudouridine.12 Uracil is one of the four nucleobases in the nucleic acid of RNA that are represented by the letters A, G, C and U.
This process of substituting letters in the genetic code is known as codon optimization, which is known to be problematic.
At the time, Seneff predicted the shots would cause a rise in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, blood disorders and heart failure, and one of the primary reasons for this is because they genetically manipulated the RNA in the shots with synthetic methylpseudouridine, which enhances RNA stability by inhibiting its breakdown.
But when substituting parts of the code in this way, the resulting protein can easily get misfolded, and this has been linked to a variety of chronic diseases,13 including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and heart failure.14 As explained by Makis, the pseudouridine insertion can also suppress your innate immune surveillance by dampening the activity of toll-like receptors, and one downstream effect of that is reduced cancer surveillance.
“The more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage, the greater your risk of impaired cancer surveillance and hence, the greater your risk of turbo cancer,” Makis says.
DNA Contamination Discovered in COVID Shots
In a preprint study, microbiologist Kevin McKernan — a former researcher and team leader for the MIT Human Genome project15 — and colleagues assessed the nucleic acid composition of four expired vials of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots. “DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency (EMA) 330ng/mg requirement and the FDAs 10ng/dose requirements” was found.16
So, in addition to the spike protein and mRNA in COVID-19 shots, McKernan’s team discovered simian virus 40 (SV40) promoters that, for decades, have been suspected of causing cancer in humans, including mesotheliomas, lymphomas and cancers of the brain and bone.17
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, called for an end to the use of COVID-19 mRNA shots, citing concerns about DNA fragments in the products.18 In a December 6, 2023, letter sent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ladapo outlined findings showing the presence of lipid nanoparticle complexes and the SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA.
While there are limits on how much DNA can be in a vaccine due to concern over DNA integration, the guidelines don’t consider lipid nanoparticles and other factors in COVID-19 shots that could enhance how much DNA can enter a cell.
“Lipid nanoparticles are an efficient vehicle for delivery of the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines into human cells and may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells.
The presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA may also pose a unique and heightened risk of DNA integration into human cells,” according to a news release from the Florida Department of Health (DOH).19 Further, according to the Florida DOH, the FDA’s own 2007 guidance states:20
“DNA integration could theoretically impact a human’s oncogenes – the genes which can transform a healthy cell into a cancerous cell.
DNA integration may result in chromosomal instability.
The Guidance for Industry discusses biodistribution of DNA vaccines and how such integration could affect unintended parts of the body including blood, heart, brain, liver, kidney, bone marrow, ovaries/testes, lung, draining lymph nodes, spleen, the site of administration and subcutis at injection site.”
How to Recover From Post-Jab Injury
If you’ve had a COVID-19 shot, there are steps you can take to repair from the assault on your system. Remember, the more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage. So, the first step is to avoid getting anymore COVID jabs. Next, if you’ve developed any unusual symptoms, seek out help from an expert.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) also has a treatment protocol for post-jab injuries. It’s called I-RECOVER and can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.21
Dr. Pierre Kory, who cofounded the FLCCC, has transitioned to treating the vaccine injured more or less exclusively. For more information, visit DrPierreKory.com. McCullough is also investigating post-jab treatments, which you can find on PeterMcCulloughMD.com.
The World Health Council has also published lists of remedies that can help inhibit, neutralize and eliminate spike protein, which most experts agree is a primary culprit. I covered these in my 2021 article, "World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox."
