Letitia James - The Docs That Prove Her Guilty
Segment #645
Two new investigations from White Collar Fraud completely dismantle the media’s defense of New York Attorney General Letitia James. The New York Times tried to paint her as the victim, and Lawfare tried to call her indictment “weak.” But both ended up confirming the very fraud she’s accused of.
Okay, so forensic accountant Sam Antar, the one name that the left-wing media never want to mention when they talk about Leticia James alleged mortgage fraud because if they did, their whole narrative would collapse. the one claiming that this was just another Trump-driven witch hunt against political enemies. But anyways, he dug into her financial disclosures and what he found was mathematically impossible. So, is this political? Because that's you just heard Chuck Schumer talk. This is all political witch hunt. This is a weaponization of the Justice Department. Are you part of the Trump administration? Because you're the first one who actually put this all together. First of all, I don't give a damn about Trump. I couldn't care less if it's political or not political. That's not my That's not my game. My game is forensic accounting. My game is showing proof and that's what I've done. Every single allegation that I've made regarding her is backed up by documents. And that's why they indicted her. Now, they indicted her on only one property so far, which is her Peron Avenue property in Northfor, Virginia. She has two other properties where she's committed serial mortgage fraud, a pattern of mortgage fraud. The other one is also in Norfork, Virginia. It's on Sterling Street. And the third third property is in Brooklyn. She's committed mortgage fraud over a period of 43 years, 13 false 13 mortgages containing false information. She put her signatures on the documents and those documents are easily publicly sourced, which I did. On her official New York State forms, James claimed that property was worth between $100,000 and $150,000. Yet, she also reported mortgages between 250 and 400,000. That is a loan to value ratio of up to 400%. Now, why would the bank issue a loan as such? It does not make any sense. When Antar ordered the title report, he discovered something worse. Her disclosed mortgages weren't even recorded. But there was one mortgage she didn't disclose, which was a 2020 loan from OVM Financial for 109,600. And attached to that mortgage, a second home writer signed by Leticia James herself, stating that she occupied the home as a personal residence and wouldn't rent it out. That's sworn under penalty of perjury. So, it is her second home and she will not rent it out. Yet on her IRS schedule E tax returns, she listed the same house as a rental property. Rents received, zero personal use days. Okay, let me explain. She has what's known as a schedule E. You file when you have rental property. On the schedule E, it says that she had zero personal days in the property and she gave it a fair market rental. That was the that was the um evidence that that implicated her because a schedule E basically says that I violated the mortgage terms. I misrepresented mortgage because I wanted I was supposed to use it as a secondary home, not a rental. But on her insurance application, it was described as owner occupied and on her New York state disclosure as an investment property. That is four different legal designations for one address. A bank says second home, insurance says owner occupied, the IRS says rental, and the state says investment. Which one is it? Because at least three of those are false.
Attached to this document was a sworn statement attesting that this is her primary residence and she would not rent it out
On her IRS Schedule E the property above was listed as rental income
On four different legal documents she falsely represented the property in Virginia
And then the NY Times attempted to write a puff piece to give James some sympathetic cover. It failed miserably.
Who is Paying Letitia James Legal Bill
Legal Defense Fund: The Democratic Attorneys General Association announced it was setting up a legal defense fund that she and other officials could use.1
This fund is routed through a 527 organization, which can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and labor unions.2
A spokesperson for the Attorney General's office indicated that the money from this fund would cover fees for her attorney's firm.3
State Funds for Separate Investigation: Her office approved a request to use up to $1 million of taxpayer funds for an outside legal firm to respond to subpoenas in a separate federal investigation into her activities (unrelated to the mortgage fraud case).4
Declined State Appropriation (for now): A special $10 million appropriation was included in the New York state budget for officials subject to what are described as retaliatory investigations.5 However, a spokesperson for the Attorney General's office said that James was declining to tap into this program for her defense in the case.6