Kirk’s Assassination Raises Questions
Segment #612
I have tremendous faith in Trump, Patel, and Bongino, but I believe they are lying about Epstein and lying about Kirk’s assassination. That said I trust that the potential damage that might be caused by our right to know must be significant. Just like history will judge Biden and his team so it will judge Trump. The truth will come out. I don’t like it but I am trusting Trump and his advisors.
PBD and the panel examine new footage and forensic analysis suggesting Charlie Kirk may have been shot from behind, raising questions about a possible second shooter. With experts, Cash Patel’s comments, and mounting public skepticism, the team calls for the release of the autopsy and full transparency.
The official story from the FBI is that Charlie Kirk was hit by a 30-06 in the neck and there was no exit wound. Is that even possible? Let's discuss...
hrough out history, we have seen people get hurt or even killed due to radicalized human beings. Remember JFK. Remember MLK. Remember Charlie Kirk. As far as I understand it, Charlie Kirk spoke openly about his beliefs and challenged opposing views on his social media pages. He spoke about what he thought was right and moral for society. He openly spoke about Jesus Christ. He took a stand against certain politicians but would gladly debate with people, mainly on college campuses. This man's life was taken during an event at the Utah Valley University while he was speaking to a crowd. There were so many camera angles and witnesses but people still come up with the craziest theories. Here in this video, my objective is to debunk some of these and focus on what we actually know and see from footage. We take a deep dive into the ballistics and how the bullet would have been stopped. Was it a "Magic Bullet"? Was he a "Man of Steel"?
Warning this video is gruesome but necessary to understand the credibility of the information we have been provided to date on the Kirk assassination. I don’t believe what we were told in the beginning and I don’t believe what we are being told now. I hope they get them.
Several tests of Ballistic Dummies, a deer and several objects showing what a .30-06 round is capable of. Trying to get a sense of the ballistics and characteristics of a .30-06 round, and why so many people are saying it is unlikely a .30-06 was used to shoot Charlie Kirk. None of these tests are a 100% representation of the rifle and angle that Tyler Robinson had on Charlie Kirk, but I feel it still gives a very accurate feel to why there should have been a much more devastating wound than the one we see. Is the FBI lying about Charlie Kirk? Take a look at the various .30-06 ballistics tests and judge for yourself.
