Jeremy Farrar - Personification of Evil
Segment # 101
This is about as sick and perverse as our current world gets. Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust in the UK was in cahoots with Fauci in covering up their complicity in funding gain of function research that later become problematic with a lab leak in Wuhan. And yes our State Depart and Defense Departments were involved as well. Farrar now goes to WHO controlled by the Chinese and the Gates Foundation as they attempt to pass internationally binding legislation that would in essence seriously marginalize US sovereignty over health and a number of other equally important areas. These folks are absolutely totalitarian megalomaniacs.
Page 1 of 7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Members
FROM: Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Majority Staff
DATE: March 5, 2023
RE: New Evidence Resulting from the Select Subcommittee’s Investigation into the
Origins of COVID-19 – “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”
On February 1, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, and at least eleven other
scientists convened a conference call to discuss COVID-19.1 It was on this conference call that
Drs. Fauci and Collins were first warned that COVID-19 may have leaked from a lab in Wuhan,
China and, further, may have been intentionally genetically manipulated.2
Only three days later, on February 4, 2020, four participants of the conference call
authored a paper entitled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” (Proximal Origin) and sent a
draft to Drs. Fauci and Collins.3 Prior to final publication in Nature Medicine, the paper was sent
to Dr. Fauci for editing and approval.4
On April 16, 2020, slightly more than two months after the original conference call, Dr.
Collins emailed Dr. Fauci expressing dismay that Proximal Origin—which they saw prior to
publication and were given the opportunity to edit—did not squash the lab leak hypothesis and
asks if the NIH can do more to “put down” the lab leak hypothesis.5 The next day—after Dr.
Collins explicitly asked for more public pressure—Dr. Fauci cited Proximal Origin from the
White House podium when asked if COVID-19 leaked from a lab.6
New evidence released by the Select Subcommittee today suggests that Dr. Fauci
“prompted” the drafting of a publication that would “disprove” the lab leak theory, the
authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal, and Dr. Jeremy
Farrar went uncredited despite significant involvement.
World Health Organization names Sir Jeremy Farrar as Chief Scientist, Dr Amelia Latu Afuhaamango Tuipulotu as Chief Nursing Officer
https://www.who.int/news/item/13-12-2022-world-health-organization-names-sir-jeremy-farrar-as-chief-scientist-dr-amelia-latu-afuhaamango-tuipulotu-as-chief-nursing-officer
13 December 2022
News release
Geneva, Switzerland
Reading time: 2 min (472 words)
WHO announced that Dr Jeremy Farrar will become its new Chief Scientist. Currently, Director of the Wellcome Trust, Dr Farrar will join WHO in the second quarter of 2023.
Dr Amelia Latu Afuhaamango Tuipulotu will become WHO's Chief Nursing Officer. Previously Minister for Health of the Kingdom of Tonga, and before that Tonga’s Chief Nursing Officer, Dr Tuipulotu will join WHO in the first quarter of 2023.
As WHO’s Chief Scientist, Dr Farrar will oversee the Science Division, bringing together the best brains in science and innovation from around the world to develop and deliver high quality health services to the people who need them most, no matter who they are and where they live.
Dr Farrar is a clinician scientist who, before joining Wellcome in 2013, spent 17 years as Director of the Clinical Research Unit at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Viet Nam where his research interests were in global health with a focus on emerging infectious diseases.
Under Dr Farrar, Wellcome has taken an increasingly global outlook, focusing on funding discovery research projects to transform understanding of life, health and well-being, and supporting science-based solutions to address three urgent challenges: infectious disease, mental health, and the effects of climate change on health.
Dr Farrar is a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences UK, European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO), the National Academies USA and a Fellow of The Royal Society.
Pandemic Treaty Will Usher in Unelected One World Government
Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
How the Government Uses Fear to Control
World Wide Web: Whom Was It Designed to Catch?
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
· February 6, 2023, the World Health Organization released a report by the director-general on the WHO’s review of amendments to the international health regulations (IHR). The IHR is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)
· The proposed IHR amendments establish a global biosecurity architecture involving health surveillance, reporting and management — and we the public have no say in the matter
· The amendments will be ready for adoption at the World Health Assembly in May 2024. A simple majority is required for the amendments to be adopted, after which they’ll come into force in 12 months
· The second attempt to seize global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO. The treaty would grant the WHO the sole power to make decisions relating to global biosecurity, including but not limited to the implementation of a global vaccine passport/digital identity, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions and standardized medical care
· The treaty will supersede the laws of member states, including the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Republican senators have introduced a bill that would require a Senate supermajority to approve the WHO treaty, but even this may not be enough. We need Congress to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether and stop funding of the WHO
·
In the Children's Health Defense video above, aired February 11, 2023, host Dr. Meryl Nass interviews investigative journalist James Corbett about the global biosecurity agenda, the World Health Organization's mishandling of global pandemics, and the two parallel processes currently underway that will effectively create a One World Government of unelected bureaucrats under the guise of global biosecurity. In a nutshell, the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State.
Attack No. 1 — International Health Regulation Amendments
As reported by Nass, February 6, 2023, the WHO released a report by the director-general on the WHO's review of amendments to the international health regulations (IHR). The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).1
This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR already grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy, under the current rules, member states must voluntarily consent to the WHO's recommendations.
Under the new amendments, however, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state, and failure to adhere to the WHO's dictates in such a situation could have severe economic consequences.
As a whole, the proposed IHR amendments establish a global biosecurity architecture involving health surveillance, reporting and management — and we the public have no say in the matter.
We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There's not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.
All we currently know is that the amendments will be ready for adoption at the World Health Assembly in May 2024.2 A simple majority is required for the amendments to be adopted, after which they'll come into force in 12 months. Member nations that disagree with the amendments have only 10 months to file a rejection or reservation.
Important IHR Amendments
While more than 300 amendments to the IHR have been proposed,3 and there's no telling which will stay and which will be tossed out, certain ones that are currently up for review are more crucial than others. Here are a few of the most egregious:
•Permissiveness of conflicts of interest and bias are baked in — Under Article 9, the WHO can declare a public health emergency based on information from undisclosed sources.
Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, or any number of other players with conflicts of interest. The WHO's risk assessments will also be based on the same type of flawed modeling and prognostication that so grossly exaggerated the risk of COVID-19.4
•Elimination of national sovereignty — Under Article 12, the director-general has unilateral power to declare a public health emergency and is not required to consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and/or the member state before doing so. So, the director-general replaces any and all national sovereign authority. The director-general can also impose sanctions on nations that refuse to follow its dictates.5
•Expansion of situations that constitute a PHEIC — A PHEIC is currently defined as an "extraordinary event" in one country that constitutes "a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response."
Amendments seek to expand and broaden this definition to include things like clusters of infection with potential but unverified human-to-human transmission. The actual risks of such clusters need not even be evaluated. What's more, the proposed definition of a PHEIC does not specify that it must involve "severe" or "life-threatening" disease, so it could be invoked for just about anything.
One of the amendments also suggests giving the director-general the ability to declare an "intermediate public health alert" when the situation doesn't fully meet the PHEIC criteria. In such an event, the director-general and/or a regional WHO director would be able to declare a public health emergency of regional concern (PHERC).6
•Expansion of the WHO's executive emergency powers to include:7
◦Permanent biosurveillance capacities
◦The authority to allocate health products worldwide
◦The authority to develop regulatory guidelines for the fast-tracking of health products
◦The capacity to "counter the dissemination of false and unreliable information" about public health events, preventive strategies and pandemic countermeasures
◦The authority to develop "an interoperability mechanism for secure global digital exchange of health information," i.e., a global health database to enable the implementation of vaccine passports
Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. Any nation which hasn't officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.
