Dem Cowards Skip Auto Pen Hearing
Segment #522
The rationale for Democrats skipping Congressional hearings depends on whether the issues discussed are important or frivolous. Is it important to know whether Biden was competent to be president? Is it important to know who authorized use of the autopen and whether Biden was even authorized these signatures? Is it important to know who authorized opening the southern border? And we could go on. It is imperative that Congress hold hearings to ensure that a system is in place to make certain these problems don’t exist in the future. That’s their job and the Dems are afraid to be accountable or to debate the manner in which they governed
MUST WATCH: Ted Cruz Brings Out The Autopen Stats To Issue Savage Takedown Of Biden's Presidency
The claim that Democrats skip congressional hearings to avoid scrutiny is a perspective often pushed by their political opponents, particularly Republicans, as seen in recent examples. Here’s a concise look based on available information:
Senate Judiciary Hearing (June 18, 2025): Most Democrats boycotted a hearing on Biden’s mental fitness, titled “Unfit to Serve.” Republicans, like Sens. John Cornyn and Eric Schmitt, argued this absence showed Democrats dodging accountability for an alleged cover-up of Biden’s cognitive decline. Democrats, including Sen. Dick Durbin, countered that the hearing was a partisan distraction, lacking credible evidence and diverting focus from Trump administration issues.
House Homeland Security Hearing (March 2023): Democrats skipped a field hearing on the border crisis, with Rep. Jerry Nadler calling it a Republican “stunt.” They argued it was politically motivated to criticize Biden’s immigration policies without bipartisan input. Republicans framed this as Democrats evading scrutiny over border security failures.
House Judiciary Hearing (February 2023): A similar boycott occurred at a border-focused hearing in Arizona, with Democrats citing lack of consultation and accusing Republicans of pushing a partisan narrative.
The pattern suggests Democrats opt out when they view hearings as politically charged or lacking legitimacy, while Republicans use these absences to claim Democrats are avoiding tough questions. X posts amplify this divide: some users call Democrats’ boycotts a refusal to face facts (e.g., on border issues or Biden’s health), while others see the hearings as GOP propaganda not warranting attendance.
Democrats’ rationale often centers on rejecting what they see as bad-faith oversight, but critics argue this can appear as sidestepping accountability, especially on contentious issues like immigration or executive fitness. Without more context on which hearing or issue you’re referring to, it’s hard to pinpoint further.
If you have a specific hearing or topic in mind, let me know, and I can dig deeper. Want me to search for more examples or analyze a particular case?