Chaos Funding- A Deeper Dive
Segment #515
The media both legacy and independent are doing a terrible job of investigating the source of funding of chaos in the U.S. It is far bigger than Los Angeles. The chaos encompasses all our large cities, our university campuses, our immigration policy, and yes the funding of our politicians. I did a much deeper dive into all this with a long segment discussing not only some of the organizations but the fact that we the taxpayers are funding some of this and maybe as important allowing international leftist to LEGALLY fund chaos in our country. As we permit our adversaries to pick us apart, we are literally in the process of funding our own demise . We should be thankful that independent journalists, podcasters, and youtubers are providing the true story of what the left is actually doing.
An Examination of Financial and Organizational Networks Behind Recent Civil Unrest in Los Angeles
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the alleged financial and organizational networks underpinning recent civil unrest, particularly the riots in Los Angeles. The investigation centers on tech tycoon Neville Singham, whose extensive global network of non-profits and shell entities is purportedly linked to the dissemination of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda and the funding of activist groups involved in the unrest.
Key findings indicate that Singham, a self-identified Marxist sympathizer based in Shanghai, allegedly funnels substantial funds to various far-left organizations in the United States. The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) is identified as a primary recipient of Singham's financial support and is implicated as a key organizer of the Los Angeles riots and other nationwide protests. The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) is noted for its role in organizing rallies and for receiving significant government grants, even while facing accusations of providing logistical and financial support to disruptive actions. Code Pink, co-founded by Singham's wife Jodie Evans, has reportedly undergone a notable ideological shift towards pro-CCP advocacy, a change that correlates with the influx of funding from Singham-linked entities.
Both the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and multiple congressional committees are actively investigating these monetary connections, focusing on potential violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). These investigations underscore growing concerns within the U.S. government regarding foreign influence operations that may exploit and exacerbate domestic societal divisions.
I. Introduction: Unrest in Los Angeles and the Search for Funding
The riots in Los Angeles aren’t “grassroots” and “spontaneous,” despite what the mainstream media claims. Glenn Beck reviews the findings of civil liberty attorney Laura Powell, which expose the radical leftist NGO network "CHIRLA" that’s funding these protests… with YOUR tax dollars.
The recent civil unrest in Los Angeles, marked by incidents of vandalism, violent clashes with law enforcement, and the obstruction of federal operations, has triggered a concerted federal investigation into its financial underpinnings. Reports from the ground indicated that participants in these demonstrations were supplied with equipment such as face shields, gas masks, and earplugs, suggesting a level of organization and preparation reminiscent of the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.1
In response to the escalating situation, FBI Director Kash Patel publicly affirmed that the Bureau is actively "investigating any and all monetary connections responsible for these riots".1 This statement highlighted a focus on identifying the systemic financial support enabling such disturbances. Concurrently, initial reports and subsequent congressional inquiries have rapidly converged on tech tycoon Neville Singham as a central figure in this financial network. Allegations suggest that Singham leverages a complex "global web of nonprofits and shell entities" to channel substantial funds to various far-left activist groups within the United States, which are then accused of orchestrating civil unrest and promoting Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda.4
II. Neville Singham's Financial and Influence Network
Neville Roy Singham, an American businessman and social activist, has emerged as a pivotal figure in the alleged funding of domestic unrest and foreign influence operations. Singham founded Thoughtworks, an IT consulting company, which he later sold in 2017 for $785 million. Following this sale, he relocated to Shanghai, China, where he maintains various business interests, including in the food and consultancy sectors. His ideological alignment is described as a supporter of Maoism, with a historical association with far-left circles in the U.S. dating back to the 1970s, including membership in the League of Revolutionary Black Workers.
A significant aspect of Singham's alleged activities involves the operation of an "elaborate dark money network".9 This network reportedly comprises a "global web of nonprofits and shell entities" 8 designed to obscure the origins and destinations of funds. Key entities within this network include the Justice and Education Fund (JEF), the United Community Fund (UCF), the People's Support Foundation (PSF), and Delaware-based Worldwide Media Holdings.9 These organizations are frequently described as having "almost no real footprints," with some operating out of UPS store mailboxes.9 The utilization of such a complex and opaque financial structure suggests a deliberate strategy to evade financial oversight and regulatory scrutiny, particularly concerning the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). This method is commonly employed in influence operations where the source or purpose of funds is intended to remain undisclosed.
The core of the allegations against Singham centers on his purported ties to Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda efforts. In 2019, Singham reportedly established a consulting business with Chinese partners who are actively involved in the CCP's propaganda apparatus.10 His office in Shanghai is shared with the Maku Group, an entity explicitly described as a "pro-Beijing propaganda outlet".4 The Maku Group's stated objective is to "educate foreigners about 'the miracles that China has created on the world stage'".11 Furthermore, Maku's website, as observed in Singham's office, prominently displays a banner proclaiming "Always Follow the Party" alongside an image of General Secretary Xi Jinping.10 Singham himself attended a Communist Party workshop in July 2023 focused on "promoting the party internationally".4
Financial flows from Singham's non-profits to the Maku Group amount to nearly $1.8 million.10 Beyond this, reports indicate that Singham's network has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to various groups and media organizations that blend progressive advocacy with pro-CCP talking points.9 This includes funding for outlets like NewsClick in India, which allegedly "sprinkled its coverage with Chinese government talking points".11 The overt ideological alignment evident in the Maku Group's messaging and in courses offered by Singham-funded entities like The People's Forum (e.g., "Lenin and the Path to Revolution," "China75 – When the People Stand Up" 13) suggests that this influence campaign aims to foster a deep-seated pro-CCP ideological framework within segments of the U.S. far-left. This approach indicates a long-term, systemic strategy to shape political discourse and potentially leverage existing ideological sympathies to advance the CCP's geopolitical objectives.
III. Key Organizations Implicated in the Riots and Their Funding
Several organizations have been identified as playing significant roles in the recent Los Angeles unrest, with alleged financial or ideological ties to Neville Singham's network.
Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL)
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., announced the House Oversight committee will be asking China-based billionaire Neville Singham to testify over his ties to the Los Angeles protests and whether or not he is funding them.
The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a communist political party established in 2004, is consistently identified as a key organizer of the Los Angeles riots and various nationwide protests.1 Reports indicate that PSL-printed signs were visible among protesters in Los Angeles.17 The organization explicitly advocates for the "revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the institution of socialism," viewing the United States as a "dictatorship of the capitalist class" that requires a "socialist revolution".16 PSL pursues its objectives through local protests, electoral campaigns, and political education.16
PSL's connections to Neville Singham's network are extensive. Singham is widely reported as the "main backer behind" PSL 9, with over $20 million in funding reportedly channeled through the Justice and Education Fund (JEF) to organizations closely associated with PSL.16 PSL leadership maintains overlapping roles with other Singham-funded entities, such as BreakThrough News and The People's Forum.4 For instance, Claudia De la Cruz, a co-founder of The People's Forum and a coordinator for JEF, ran as the PSL candidate for president in 2024.4 The PSL also maintains a strong pro-CCP stance, advocating for the "militant political defense of the Chinese government".16 Additionally, PSL has a documented "history of anti-Israel activism".8
While numerous sources directly link PSL to the organization of the Los Angeles riots, a notable contrast exists in PSL's public statements. An organizer for PSL, Ximena Hasbach, stated during a solidarity protest in Boston that the organization "doesn't ever endorse violence" and that the event remained non-violent.23 This highlights a potential divergence between external accusations of instigating violence and the organization's stated principles of non-violent advocacy, or at least a distinction in how different protests are conducted or characterized.
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA)
HIRLA (Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights):
CHIRLA received approximately $34 million in government grants between 2020 and 2023, with most of this funding coming from the state of California rather than the federal government
From the federal government specifically, CHIRLA was awarded three grants totaling $750,000 from the Biden administration
Additionally, CHIRLA received about $450,000 in federal grants for "citizenship education and training" from the Department of Homeland Security between October 2021 and 2023. However, the federal relationship was severed in March 2023, and approximately $101,000 in undisbursed funds was reclaimed by DHS
In summary, CHIRLA’s direct federal funding from 2020 to 2024 appears to be between $750,000 and $1.2 million, with the remainder of its $34 million in government grants coming primarily from state and local sources
Code Pink
At a Senate Health Committee hearing on antisemitism on college campuses last week, Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN) questioned witnesses about the left-wing activist group Code Pink.
The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) is a non-profit organization that has been implicated in organizing "inflammatory rallies" in the city.5 CHIRLA played a "prominent role in rallying support" during the anti-ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) protests in Los Angeles.1 Its Executive Director, Angelica Salas, was actively present at press conferences during these events, condemning ICE actions and stating, "Our community is under attack and is being terrorized".5 CHIRLA operates a "Rapid Response Network" to alert community members about ICE activities and provide support.24 The organization also mobilizes volunteers for marches and protests, and engages in community education on immigrant rights.27
CHIRLA's funding sources have drawn significant scrutiny. The organization is a 501(c)(3) non-profit that relies on donations.29 However, it also receives substantial government funding. In Fiscal Year 2023, CHIRLA reported $33,966,572 in "government contracts" revenue.30 This figure is notably higher than a specific $450,000 grant awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) via U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for "Citizenship Instruction and Naturalization Services" in the same fiscal year.31
The substantial government funding received by CHIRLA concurrently with accusations of its involvement in "disruptive actions" and "inflammatory rallies" highlights a critical tension. This situation prompts questions regarding the oversight and accountability of federal grants to non-governmental organizations, particularly when these organizations are simultaneously implicated in activities that escalate into civil unrest. The significant difference between the total "government contracts" revenue and specific grants for citizenship services suggests a broad scope of activities funded by public money, some of which may be interpreted differently by various stakeholders.
Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) has accused CHIRLA of "providing logistical support and financial resources to individuals engaged in these disruptive actions," asserting that "bankrolling civil unrest is not protected speech. It is aiding and abetting criminal conduct".18 In response, CHIRLA's Executive Director Angelica Salas has "categorically reject[ed] any allegation that our work... violates the law," stating that their "mission is rooted in non-violent advocacy, community safety, and democratic values".25 Legal experts have suggested that such threats of investigation could be perceived as "political persecution" aimed at stifling dissent.18
Code Pink, a women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement, was co-founded by Jodie Evans, who married Neville Roy Singham in 2017.8 Since this marriage, Code Pink has reportedly received a significant portion of its funding from Singham-linked groups, amounting to approximately 25% of its donations, or over $1.4 million since 2017.11
A notable observation is the documented ideological shift in Code Pink's stance on China, which has transitioned from a critical perspective in 2015 to "unquestioningly supportive" and "stridently support[ive]" following Evans' marriage to Singham and the influx of his funding.15 Jodie Evans herself has publicly described Uyghurs as "terrorists" and defended their mass detention, denying allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang.15 This correlation between financial ties and a dramatic change in policy position raises serious questions about the integrity and independence of advocacy within the U.S., particularly when such advocacy aligns with the geopolitical interests of a foreign power and involves the denial of widely reported human rights abuses.
Code Pink actively engages in various forms of activism and advocacy. The organization published an "anti-ICE toolkit" to resist immigration enforcement, advocating for "a world without cages, borders, and deportations".8 Its broader agenda includes opposition to drone strikes, the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, and U.S. sanctions on "authoritarian regimes" such as Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, China, and Cuba.42 Code Pink also maintains a strong anti-Israel stance, evidenced by its "No Pride in Genocide" campaign, calls to "Stop Arming Genocide," and rhetoric demanding "complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea".41 The group has also been noted for disrupting congressional hearings, including a House Select Committee on the CCP hearing where a member shouted, "China is not our enemy!".4
Despite these accusations of foreign influence, Code Pink vehemently denies being funded by China or any other foreign government, asserting that its funding comes primarily from individual donors.49 The organization dismisses claims of FARA violations, stating that its advocacy is solely focused on promoting peace and diplomacy to avoid war, rather than serving foreign interests.
How many international NGOs are funding left leaning non profits in the United States and is it legal?
In the yellow this paid protestor has turned up at a number of protests with totally different left wing agendas. Today she is working for Rise and Resist. Rise and Resist is an independent activist group that uses ActBlue for its fundraising. While it is one of several organizations raising money via ActBlue, there is no evidence from the search results that it is directly controlled by ActBlue or the Democratic Party; rather, it leverages the platform as a tool for collecting donations to support its mission.
There is no comprehensive, publicly available figure for the exact number of international NGOs funding left-leaning non-profits in the United States. However, several key points emerge from the available information:
Foreign Funding Is Legal and Common: U.S. law does not prohibit NGOs from receiving foreign funding, whether from foreign governments or private international sources
Prominent International Funders: Major international NGOs and foundations—such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Tides Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation—are well-documented funders of left-leaning U.S. non-profits
For example, MoveOn.org has received millions from Soros’ Open Society Policy Center and significant funding from the Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss via the Sixteen Thirty Fund
No Official Count: While it is clear that multiple international NGOs and foundations are active in this space, there is no authoritative or official count of how many are doing so. The landscape is complex, with many organizations operating through networks and intermediary funds, making precise quantification difficult
Examples, Not Exhaustive List: The search results mention several international funders, but these are illustrative rather than exhaustive. The Open Society Foundations, Tides Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation are among the most frequently cited, but there are others, and the number fluctuates as new organizations emerge and funding priorities shift
Summary:
While the exact number is unknown, it is clear that several major international NGOs and foundations fund left-leaning non-profits in the United States, and there is no legal barrier to such funding. The most prominent funders include the Open Society Foundations, Tides Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others, but no single source tracks the total number of international NGOs involved
IV. Federal and Congressional Investigations
The financial and organizational ties behind the Los Angeles riots have triggered significant investigative efforts from both federal law enforcement and legislative bodies.
FBI's Ongoing Probe
The FBI is actively investigating the "monetary connections" responsible for the riots, as stated by Director Kash Patel.1 This probe extends beyond individual perpetrators to identify the broader networks providing financial and logistical support. Federal authorities have already made arrests related to the unrest, including individuals charged with possessing Molotov cocktails and assaulting federal officers.52 Additionally, an individual was arrested for allegedly distributing "bionic shield" face masks to suspected rioters, indicating a focus on those providing material support to disruptive actions.3 U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli has emphasized the priority of identifying, locating, and arresting those involved in "organizing, supporting, funding or facilitating these riots".3
Congressional Scrutiny and FARA Implications
Concurrent with the FBI's investigation, multiple congressional committees have launched their own inquiries into the funding and organization of the Los Angeles riots and related activities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, along with the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime & Terrorism, are actively probing the financial ties of Neville Singham and the organizations within his network, including PSL, CHIRLA, and Code Pink.2
A central element of these congressional investigations is the potential violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Lawmakers have explicitly requested documents and information from Singham regarding his funding of PSL and other entities, with threats of subpoenas and referrals for criminal prosecution if he fails to comply.4 The concern stems from reports suggesting that Singham may be acting as an agent for the CCP, given his close ties to Chinese government media and propaganda efforts.4 The explicit focus of both federal law enforcement and congressional bodies on the
financial backing and organizational support of the riots, rather than solely on individual perpetrators, indicates a recognition of sophisticated, potentially foreign-backed influence operations. This emphasis on FARA suggests a strategic shift towards addressing the underlying networks that enable such unrest, viewing them as national security concerns.
Congressional inquiries also extend to the alleged role of state and local officials. Letters have been sent to California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, requesting documents and communications related to the riots and their response to federal immigration enforcement actions. Accusations have been made that their "sanctuary policies" and actions may have obstructed federal objectives and contributed to the unrest.3
"Strategy of Sowing Discord" Allegations
A significant assertion made by congressional investigators is that Neville Singham's activities may be part of the CCP's "Strategy of Sowing Discord".9 This strategy, attributed to General Secretary Xi, involves "efforts to make internal disputes amongst the enemy so deep that they become distracted from conflict".9 If confirmed, the alleged implementation of this strategy through the funding and organization of domestic civil unrest would represent a significant escalation in geopolitical competition. This implies a sophisticated, long-term foreign policy objective that leverages existing societal divisions within the United States for strategic destabilization, moving beyond traditional foreign influence into a form of hybrid warfare.
V. Conclusions
The ongoing investigations into the funding of the Los Angeles riots reveal a complex nexus of financial networks, activist organizations, and alleged foreign influence. Neville Singham stands as a central figure, accused of utilizing an opaque global web of non-profits and shell entities to channel substantial funds to far-left groups. Evidence suggests a strong ideological and financial alignment between Singham's network and the Chinese Communist Party's propaganda objectives.
The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) is consistently identified as a key organizer of the Los Angeles riots, receiving significant backing from Singham's network. While PSL's stated principles emphasize non-violence, the escalation of protests into riots raises questions about the direct or indirect consequences of their organizational efforts. CHIRLA, an immigrant rights organization, is also implicated in organizing rallies and has received substantial government funding, prompting scrutiny regarding the use of public funds amidst accusations of facilitating disruptive actions. Code Pink's demonstrated shift towards pro-CCP advocacy, directly correlating with financial ties to Singham, underscores concerns about the susceptibility of U.S. activist groups to foreign financial influence.
The coordinated efforts by the FBI and various congressional committees to investigate these monetary connections and potential FARA violations signify a heightened awareness of sophisticated foreign influence operations. The explicit focus on the "Strategy of Sowing Discord" suggests a recognition that external actors may be actively exploiting and exacerbating internal societal divisions within the United States for strategic geopolitical advantage. The outcome of these investigations will have significant implications for regulatory compliance, national security, and the broader understanding of how foreign interests may seek to impact domestic stability.