Big Pharma, The NIH, and the Wuhan Coverup
Segment # 175
Why do we care? Simply put, government agencies are structured and supported by US taxpayer dollars to protect US citizens and regulate Big Pharma. Big Pharm makes side deals where, in essence, employees of these government agencies get paid for services by these same companies. We, as taxpayers, should be able to see these agreements. The databases we have seen like VAERS, VSAFE, DMED, Funeral Homes, etc have already painted a very corrupt picture of what happened during COVID. It will eventually come out, but big money is doing everything to make the process as difficult as possible. Remember these pharmaceutical companies have liability protection except in the case of Fraud.
the NIH is refusing to comply with @ZackStieber’s FOI request on the money they were paid for providing the genetic payloads for the mRNA vaxxes. They are claiming exemption for trade secrets which is utterly ridiculous. This is about money. The NIH was paid at least $400 million by Moderna. They seem to be owed quite a lot more including from bioNtech who also licensed the tech then licensed it to Pfizer and who look to be stiffing the feds. (this all came out in an SEC filing).
So let’s recap:
NIH used taxpayer money to illegally fund the gain of function on coronaviruses.
They created COVID-19 19 then lied about it.
Because they did, they also had the genetic code and a dodgy mRNA vax blueprint lying around.
They licensed it at “warp speed” to Moderna and bioNtech which is how these products got to market so quickly.
They received large royalties for this and many of those royalties likely went to individual NIH staffers.
Those staffers do not even need to disclose what they got. There is no rule or regulation requiring it.
And now, when asked under FOIA to share the contracts, they are flatly refusing to let any sunshine whatsoever anywhere near this issue.
It appears that the NIH did refuse to release details about its royalty agreement with Moderna for the COVID-19 vaccine: The NIH refused to provide any materials in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from The Epoch Times seeking more details about the agreement. The NIH cited exemptions that allow the government to withhold trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential.2 In February 2023, Moderna announced it had paid $400 million to the NIH as part of a licensing agreement for the spike proteins used in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. However, the details of future payments, which are said to be based on vaccine sales, were redacted in the contract obtained by The Epoch Times.2 The search results do not indicate that the FOIA request was made by someone named Zack Stieber. The request appears to have been made by The Epoch Times.
References:
US: NIH Refuses To Release Details Of COVID-19 Vaccine Royalty Agreement
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times https://www.gulf-insider.com/us-nih-refuses-to-release-details-of-covid-19-vaccine-royalty-agreement/
The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136690/
https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116623/documents/HHRG-118-IF02-20231130-SD003.pdf
The Great COVID Cover-up: Shocking truth about Wuhan and 15 federal agencies
Shame on all the federal employees who covered up these facts about COVID-19
The Great COVID Cover-up: Shocking truth about Wuhan and 15 federal agencies | Fox News
The DEFUSE project was a proposal by Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to create a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site, making it more adapted for human transmission. 1
This DEFUSE proposal was pitched to at least 15 federal agencies in 2018, including Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). However, none of these agencies warned the public about the proposal to create a COVID-19-like virus. 1
The documents show that NIAID and Fauci's Rocky Mountain Lab were named as partners on the DEFUSE proposal alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This suggests Fauci's agency was aware of the Wuhan lab's plans to create a coronavirus adapted for human transmission. 1
Despite this knowledge, Fauci and the 15 agencies did not warn the public about the DEFUSE proposal or the potential risks of the Wuhan lab's coronavirus research. This has led to accusations that Fauci and others were involved in a "cover-up" of the origins of COVID-19. 13
In summary, the DEFUSE project was a proposal to create a dangerous coronavirus that was known to multiple government agencies, including Fauci's NIAID, but was not disclosed to the public, according to the search results provided.